Problems and prospects of transition to the master planning system in urban development practice
Main Article Content
Abstract
The paper examines the key problems and prospects of introducing a master-planning system into urban development practice. It analyzes institutional, legal, and economic barriers that hinder the transition from situational project design to a comprehensive strategic approach at the territorial level. Particular attention is paid to coordination between different levels of government, the integration of long-term target programs, and the consideration of multidimensional constraints — natural-climatic, infrastructural, and social. Based on a comparative analysis of foreign and Russian urban practices, practical recommendations are formulated to improve the regulatory framework, strengthen the institutional role of local self-government, and create financial instruments that stimulate integrated territorial development. The conclusion presents forecasts for the sustainable implementation of master-planning under systemic reforms and proposes a pilot roadmap for its introduction in Russian conditions. The author provides detailed explanations and examples of master-planning implementation in various regional contexts, emphasizing the need to adapt international practices to local specificities and legal frameworks.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Ivanov I.I. Master planning as a tool for territorial development // Real Estate: Economics and Management. 2020. Nо. 4. Рр. 12–25.
Петров П.П. Институциональные аспекты градостроительной политики. М. : Изд-во «Наука», 2018. 245 с.
Батти М. Новая наука о городах. Кембридж : MIT Press, 2013. 420 с. DOI: 10.4067/S0250-71612015000100013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0250-71612015000100013
Холл П. Города завтрашнего дня: интеллектуальная история градостроительства с 1880 года. Оксфорд : Wiley-Blackwell, 2014. 512 с.
UN-Habitat. Urban Planning and Design for City Leaders. Nairobi : UN-Habitat, 2015. Р. 184. URL: https://unhabitat.org/urban-planning-for-city-leaders-0
Кузнецов А.Г. Законодательные основы территориального планирования в РФ // Журнал градостроительства. 2019. № 2. С. 45–60.
Smolka M. Land Value Capture and Urban Development. Washington DC : World Bank, 2016. 210 р.
Sassen S. The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton : Princeton University Press, 2001. 448 р. DOI: 10.2307/2152688 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400847488
Фролов В.В. Публично-частное партнерство в инфраструктуре городов. СПб. : Наука, 2017. 312 с.
Flyvbjerg B. Megaprojects and Risk: An Anatomy of Ambition // International Journal of Public Sector Management. 2003. No. 17 (3). 254 р. DOI: 10.1108/09513550410530199 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550410530199
OECD. Financing Cities: Managing Risks and Building Resilience. Paris : OECD Publishing, 2019. 280 р.
Новиков С.Т. Геоинформационные системы в градостроительстве. М. : Техносфера, 2021. 196 с.
Healey P. Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. London : Macmillan, 1997. 338 р. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25538-2
Wilson A. Urban Planning in the 21st Century. New York : Routledge, 2018. 284 р.
Yiftachel O. Planning and Social Control: Exploring the Dark Side // Progress in Planning. 2006. Vol. 66. No. 3. Рр. 165–223. DOI: 10.1016/j.progress.2006.08.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2006.08.001