Problems and prospects of transition to the master planning system in urban development practice

Main Article Content

Timur Kamilevich Tagirov
Aleksandr Konstantinovich Orlov

Abstract

The paper examines the key problems and prospects of introducing a master-planning system into urban development practice. It analyzes institutional, legal, and economic barriers that hinder the transition from situational project design to a comprehensive strategic approach at the territorial level. Particular attention is paid to coordination between different levels of government, the integration of long-term target programs, and the consideration of multidimensional constraints — natural-climatic, infrastructural, and social. Based on a comparative analysis of foreign and Russian urban practices, practical recommendations are formulated to improve the regulatory framework, strengthen the institutional role of local self-government, and create financial instruments that stimulate integrated territorial development. The conclusion presents forecasts for the sustainable implementation of master-planning under systemic reforms and proposes a pilot roadmap for its introduction in Russian conditions. The author provides detailed explanations and examples of master-planning implementation in various ­regional contexts, emphasizing the need to adapt international practices to local specificities and legal frameworks.

Article Details

How to Cite
Tagirov, T. K., & Orlov, A. K. (2025). Problems and prospects of transition to the master planning system in urban development practice. Real Estate: Economics, Management, (4), 29–31. https://doi.org/10.22337/2073-8412-2025-4-29-31
Section
Urban regulation and management of housing and public utilities

References

Ivanov I.I. Master planning as a tool for territorial development // Real Estate: Economics and Management. 2020. Nо. 4. Рр. 12–25.

Петров П.П. Институциональные аспекты градостроительной политики. М. : Изд-во «Наука», 2018. 245 с.

Батти М. Новая наука о городах. Кембридж : MIT Press, 2013. 420 с. DOI: 10.4067/S0250-71612015000100013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0250-71612015000100013

Холл П. Города завтрашнего дня: интеллектуальная история градостроительства с 1880 года. Оксфорд : Wiley-Blackwell, 2014. 512 с.

UN-Habitat. Urban Planning and Design for City Leaders. Nairobi : UN-Habitat, 2015. Р. 184. URL: https://unhabitat.org/urban-planning-for-city-leaders-0

Кузнецов А.Г. Законодательные основы территориального планирования в РФ // Журнал градостроительства. 2019. № 2. С. 45–60.

Smolka M. Land Value Capture and Urban Development. Washington DC : World Bank, 2016. 210 р.

Sassen S. The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton : Princeton University Press, 2001. 448 р. DOI: 10.2307/2152688 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400847488

Фролов В.В. Публично-частное партнерство в инфраструктуре городов. СПб. : Наука, 2017. 312 с.

Flyvbjerg B. Megaprojects and Risk: An Anatomy of Ambition // International Journal of Public Sector Management. 2003. No. 17 (3). 254 р. DOI: 10.1108/09513550410530199 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550410530199

OECD. Financing Cities: Managing Risks and Building Resilience. Paris : OECD Publishing, 2019. 280 р.

Новиков С.Т. Геоинформационные системы в градостроительстве. М. : Техносфера, 2021. 196 с.

Healey P. Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. London : Macmillan, 1997. 338 р. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25538-2

Wilson A. Urban Planning in the 21st Century. New York : Routledge, 2018. 284 р.

Yiftachel O. Planning and Social Control: Exploring the Dark Side // Progress in Planning. 2006. Vol. 66. No. 3. Рр. 165–223. DOI: 10.1016/j.progress.2006.08.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2006.08.001

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.