Methodological approach to calculating the integral indicator of ­organizational and technological reliability of repair and ­restoration processes of apartment buildings

Main Article Content

Valentin Valentinovich Volgin
Ekaterina Vladislavovna Dekhtyar

Abstract

The housing stock is subject to moral and physical deterioration, which requires timely repair and restoration work. The efficiency of such work directly affects the durability of structural elements, the performance characteristics of buildings and the cost of their maintenance. In the context of limited resources and increasing demands on the quality of repairs, there is a need to develop methods to objectively assess the reliability of repair processes. One of the key approaches to such an assessment is the use of an integral organizational and technological indicator of reliability, which takes into account a set of factors affecting the efficiency of the repair work performed. This indicator allows you to quantitatively assess the impact of organizational, technological and economic factors on the reliability of the process, identify problem areas in the repair management system and predict the time between repairs. This article presents a methodology for calculating the integral indicator of the organizational and technological indicator of the reliability of repair processes, based on a comprehensive consideration of many factors and their significance. The development of this methodology will improve the objectivity of assessing the reliability of repair processes, optimize the distribution of resources, and increase the service life of buildings through rational planning of repair activities. The proposed approach can be used both in the design of repair work and in their analysis and improvement during the operation of buildings.


The developed neural network model uses a multi-layer approach with an activation function in hidden layers and a sigmoid in the output layer. Input data are normalized and processed using the backpropagation method, which allows for more accurate forecasting of inter-repair periods and assessment of the operational reliability of a building.

Article Details

Section

Technologies and organization of constraction

How to Cite

Methodological approach to calculating the integral indicator of ­organizational and technological reliability of repair and ­restoration processes of apartment buildings. (2025). Real Estate: Economics, Management, 1, 34-37. https://doi.org/10.22337/2073-8412-2025-1-34-37

References

Гаврилов Л.А. Техническое обслуживание и ремонт зданий / под ред. Л.А. Гаврилова, В.П. Никитина. М. : Высшая школа, 2018. 304 с.

Егоров А.Н. Анализ надежности строительных объектов. Екатеринбург : УрФУ, 2020. 275 с.

Волгин В.В. Формирование методов интегрального управления организационно-технологической надежностью жизненных циклов промышленного девелопмента индустриальных парков. 2023. 219 с. EDN WNCPYM.

Сеземин Д.Е. Разработка интегрированной системы управления организационно-технологической надежностью основных фаз строительства объектов атомной энергетики за рубежом : автореф. дис. … канд. техн. наук. М., 2024. 218 с.

Золотарев А.В. Прогнозирование срока службы зданий. ­Казань : КазГАСУ, 2017. 256 с.

Кирсанов М.В. Структурные модели надежности строительных объектов. М. : Изд-во МГСУ, 2021. 312 с.

Кузнецов П.Л. Нейросетевые технологии в прогнозировании технического состояния зданий. СПб. : Политех-пресс, 2022. 278 с.

Малышев С.А. Оптимизация ремонтно-восстановительных работ с применением нейронных сетей. Томск : ТГАСУ, 2021. 305 с.

Павлов И.С. Нейросетевые алгоритмы в строительном прогнозировании. М. : МИСиС, 2020. 289 с.

Романов О.Г. Инженерный мониторинг зданий и сооружений. Новосибирск : Сибстрин, 2018. 265 с.

Сидоров А.А. Искусственные нейронные сети в прогнозировании строительных процессов. СПб. : Изд-во Политехнического университета, 2021. 302 с.

Frangopol D.M., Soliman M. Life-Cycle of Structural Systems: Design, Assessment, Maintenance and Management // Journal of Structural Integrity and Maintenance. 2016. No. 1 (1). Рр. 1–21. DOI: 10.1080/24705314.2016.1154001

Zhou Y., Chen B. Reliability Analysis of Building Structures Subjected to Multiple Hazards : a Review // Structural Safety. 2019. No. 76. Рр. 68–80. DOI: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2018.08.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2018.08.002

Strauss A., Frangopol D.M., Kim S. Advanced Life-Cycle Analysis of Infrastructure Systems: Recent Developments and Future Directions // Structure and Infrastructure Engineering. 2018. No. 14 (7). Рр. 896–910. DOI: 10.1080/15732479.2018.1431983

Федоров Е.Н. Нейросетевые технологии в анализе долговечности зданий. Екатеринбург : УрФУ, 2020. 290 с.

Yuen K.V., Kuok S.C. Ambient interference in wireless sensor networks for bridge health monitoring // Structural Control and Health Monitoring. 2010. No. 17 (6). Рр. 642–653.

Zhou H., Yi T.H. Neural network committee-based structural damage detection strategy using incomplete modal data without baseline information // Journal of Sound and Vibration. 2013. No. 332 (6). Рр. 1451–1464.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)