Property economics and management No. 2 (2024): Real estate: economics, management

Assessment of the state of integrated security system at the enterprise using the priority setting method

pdf
How to Cite

Assessment of the state of integrated security system at the enterprise using the priority setting method

Authors

  • Evgeny Vladimirovich Gvozdev Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22337/2073-8412-2024-2-33-36

Keywords:

Integrated security system, priority setting method, Gaussian normal distribution, influence coefficient, expert decision

Abstract

The paper presents justification for using the priority setting method together with the Gaussian normal distribution functional to assess the state of the integrated security system of production enterprises. The justified method has a certain advantage over other methods of expert assessment due to the fact that it has no limit to expanding the boundaries in order to obtain adequate results in the form of quantitative values. The statistics of the occurrence of accidents and fires at enterprises of the oil and gas complex of Russia is analyzed, information is presented on the procedure for determining the primary factors initiating the occurrence of joint events (accidents and fires). An example is shown with the results of processing information received from experts. The developments presented in the paper will make it possible to solve in practice the problem of reducing damage from accidents and fires, i.e. solve a problem that has important socio-economic significance for Russia.

154 60

References

Гвоздев Е. В. A rational-targeted model for the development of an integrated safety and security system at oil and gas enterprises in Russia // Недвижимость: экономика, управление. 2023. № 1. С. 33–38. DOI: 10.22337/2073-8412-2023-1-33-38URL: https://n-eu.iasv.ru/index.php/neu/article/view/114/136 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22337/2073-8412-2023-1-33-38

Gvozdev E. V. Risk assessment methodology within the framework of integrated safety of industrial enterprises // E3S Web of Conferences. 2023. Vol. 457. P. 02004. DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202345702004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202345702004

Махутов Н. А., Гаденин М. М. Научная информационно-аналитическая база промышленной безопасности // Безопасность труда в промышленности. 2023. № 10. С. 20–26. DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2023-10-20-26 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24000/0409-2961-2023-10-20-26

Gvozdev E. V. On a rational-target model for the development of integrated security system at the enterprises of the Russia's oil and gas sector // 2023 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Applications (DASA), Annaba, Algeria, 2023. Pp. 406–409. DOI: 10.1109/DASA59624.2023.10286572 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/DASA59624.2023.10286572

Гражданкин А. И., Печеркин А. С., Сидоров В. И. О возможности единых и контрпродуктивности одинаковых критериев оценки риска промышленной аварии // Безопасность труда в промышленности. 2023. № 10. С. 36–44. DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2023-10-36-44 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24000/0409-2961-2023-10-36-44

Гвоздев Е. В. Развитие методологии управления риском на взрывопожароопасных объектах предприятий // Безопасность труда в промышленности. 2023. № 8. С. 61–69. DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2023-8-61-69 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24000/0409-2961-2023-8-61-69

Bochkov A. Reflections on Dual nature of risk. Toward a formalism // Reliability: Theory & Applications. 2023. Vol. 18. Issue 5 (75). Рр. 44–74. DOI: 10.24412/1932-2321-2023-575-44-74

Arefyeva E. Managing the risk of emergencies caused by groundwater flooding of the historical built-up areas // Reliability: Theory & Applications. 2023. Vol. 18. Issue S5 (75). Pр. 125–135. DOI: 10.24412/1932-2321-2023-575-125-135

Блюмберг В. А., Глущенко В. Ф. Какое решение лучше? Метод расстановки приоритетов. Л. : Лениздат, 1982. 160 с.

Гвоздев Е. В. Постановка и решение задачи по развитию системы комплексной безопасности на взрывопожароопасных производственных объектах предприятий // Безопасность труда в промышленности. 2023. № 10. С. 45–53. DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2023-10-45-53 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24000/0409-2961-2023-10-45-53

Беликов А. Б. Математическая обработка результатов геодезических измерений : учеб. пос. // Министерство образования и науки РФ. НИУ МГСУ, 2-е изд. перераб. М. : НИУ МГСУ, 2016.432 с.

Alamdari A. M., Jabarzadeh Y., Adams B., Samson D., Khanmohammadi S. An analytic network process model to prioritize supply chain risks in green residential megaprojects // Operations Management Research. 2023. Vol. 16. Issue 1. DOI: 10.1007/s12063-022-00288-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-022-00288-2

Dvulit P., Savchuk S., Sosonka I. Accuracy estimation of site coordinates derived from GNSS-observations by non-classical error theory of measurements // Geodesy and Geodynamics. 2021. Vol. 12. Issue 5. DOI: 10.1016/j.geog.2021.07.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geog.2021.07.005

Downloads

Published

2024-06-21

Issue

Section

Property economics and management

How to Cite

Assessment of the state of integrated security system at the enterprise using the priority setting method. (2024). Real Estate: Economics, Management, 2, 33-36. https://doi.org/10.22337/2073-8412-2024-2-33-36

Keywords

Integrated security system priority setting method Gaussian normal distribution influence coefficient expert decision

Most read articles by the same author(s)