Мethods of increasing the input capacity of industrial housing construction enterprises
Мethods of increasing the input capacity of industrial housing construction enterprises
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22337/2073-8412-2024-1-47-50Keywords:
industrial housing construction enterprises, production system, input capacity, production intensification, labour productivity, potential, flow productionAbstract
Input capacity of the industrial housing construction enterprise (IHCE) reflects the maximum volume of finished construction products that the enterprise is able to produce over a period of time. It is expedient to increase the input capacity of IHCE by intensification of its production. It becomes possible with a deep understanding of work of its production system (PS), and taking into account its peculiarities: firstly, due to the complexity of formulating and solving in analytical form the problem of making an optimal decision within the framework of production management, it is advisable to resort to the variant approach. This approach implies the use of various management strategies and tactics depending on the specific situation, operating conditions and objectives of the enterprise; secondly, production technologies and its material and technical base are constantly updated following the progressive development of scientific and technical progress. Consequently, there is the emergence of more and more advanced forms of organization and management of production processes, as well as changing methods of planning business processes of the enterprise; thirdly, the production system of IHCE should be analyzed systematically. The system approach to production analysis is a methodology that allows analyzing production processes as a single interconnected system rather than as a set of individual elements or operations. Growth of input capacity during intensification of IHCE production by various methods, including by increasing labour productivity, adapting the means of labour and proper adjustment of production flows, in which specialization, proportionality, parallelism, directness, continuity, rhythmicity and automation are achieved. This in turn increases the input capacity of the enterprise.
References
Прыкин Б. В. Технико-экономический анализ производства. 2-е изд., перераб. и доп. М. : ЮНИТИ, 2003. 475 с.
Грабовый П. Г., Гребенщиков В. С. Оценка потенциалоемкости производственной строительной системы при реализации крупных инвестиционных проектов // Недвижимость: экономика, управление. 2017. № 2. С. 76–81. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30775540
Грабовый П. Г., Жихарев Д. Ф. Производительность предприятия индустриального домостроения как главный индикатор роста потенциалоемкости производственно-строительной системы // Недвижимость: экономика, управление. 2022. № 2. С. 11–17. DOI: 10.22337/2073-8412-2022-2-11-17 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22337/2073-8412-2022-2-11-17
Монфред Ю. Б., Прыкин Б. В. Организация, планирование и управление предприятиями стройиндустрии. М. : Стройиздат, 1989. 506 с.
Родионова В. Н. Системный подход как общеметодологический принцип исследования организации производственных систем // Организатор производства. 2008. № 3 (38). C. 12–13. URL: istemnyy-podhod-kak-obschemetodologicheskiy-printsip-issledovaniya-organizatsii-proizvodstvennyh-sistem
Наместникова Л. С., Пахомова А. А. Системный подход к управлению эффективностью производственных систем // Вестник Южно-Российского государственного технического университета (НПИ). Серия: Социально-экономические науки. 2016. № 3. С. 86–91. URL: https://vestnik.npi-tu.ru/index.php/vestnikSRSTU/article/view/759/760
Zhu Z., Dutta A., Dai F. Exoskeletons for manual material handling : A review and implication for construction applications // Automation in Construction. 2021. Vol. 122. P. 103493. DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103493 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103493
Golabchi A., Riahi N., Fix M., Miller L., Rouhani H., Tavakoli M. A framework for evaluation and adoption of industrial exoskeletons // Applied Ergonomics. 2023. Vol. 113. Р. 104103. DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2023.104103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2023.104103
Ralfs L., Hoffmann N., Glitsch U., Heinrich K., Johns J., Weidner R. Insights into evaluating and using industrial exoskeletons: Summary report, guideline, and lessons learned from the interdisciplinary project “Exo@Work” // International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 2023. Vol. 97. Р. 103494. DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2023.103494 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2023.103494
Иванов А. С. Планирование и организация производства. От индустриальной экономики к экономике знаний. Москва ; Берлин : Директ-Медиа, 2016. 203 с.
Науменко И. Х. Проектирование поточной организации производства строительных работ. М. : Изд-во АСВ, 2008. 118 с.
Лебедев В. М. Системотехника поточных методов строительства. Saarbrucken, Gemany : LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, 2016. 248 с.
Nguyen T. T., Dinh K. An artificial intelligence approach for concrete hardened property estimation // Journal of Science and Technology in Civil Engineering (JSTCE) — HUCE. 2020. Vol. 14. Issue 2. Pp. 40–52. DOI: 10.31814/stce.nuce2020-14(2)-04 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31814/stce.nuce2020-14(2)-04
Waqar A., Bheel N., Tayeh B. A. Modeling the effect of implementation of artificial intelligence powered image analysis and pattern recognition algorithms in concrete industry // Developments in the Built Environment. 2024. Vol. 17. P. 100349. DOI: 10.1016/j.dibe.2024.100349 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dibe.2024.100349
Wang Q., Hussain A., Farooqi M., Deifalla A. Artificial intelligence-based estimation of ultra-high-strength concreteʹs flexural property // Case Studies in Construction Materials. 2022. Vol. 17. P. e01243. DOI: 10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01243 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01243
